Really? What kind of fluff article is this? Is Time Magazine afraid to run a story on Julian Assange? Will the black government helicopters come and take them away? Actually Time has other ties to Facebook and they want to cash in on it. Here is the quote from Time Magazine. ” he was chosen for changing how we all live our lives in ways that are innovative and even optimistic.”
Facebook is an utter waste of time. It is not original or well designed. Its nice at first to stay in touch with some distant friends but after a while you have so many people on there that you don’t really want to keep in touch with and then you stop using it. The idea that it is worth billions of dollars is one of the moronic thoughts that lead to the internet stock bubble that has already burst. Yahoo do not waste your money. The AOL and Myspace buyers lost all of their investments.
Facebook changed the world how exactly? By ripping off other social networking sites? This is a poor attempt by Time magazine to appear relevant – as if Time magazine means anything to anyone anymore. I don’t read it. Facebook is an online fad and so Time thought that they might get some attention by trying to ride the coattails of Zuckerbergs undeserved fame. Its all about sales.
Zuckerberg is an idiot for not taking the billion dollars offered by a bigger idiot willing to pay for it. He is going to end up the way of MySpace and have a worthless pile of computers when he could have retired at the age of 25.
This award is supposed to go to the person who most influenced the world (for good or bad) Shame on you Time Magazine for writing an advertorial.


