<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Forest Gump Says &#187; Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forestgumpsays.com/category/photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forestgumpsays.com</link>
	<description>My Take on Business, Cars, Photography, and Computers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:44:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Install Canon EOS Utility Without the CD or Old Version</title>
		<link>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/install-canon-eos-utility-without-the-cd-or-old-version/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/install-canon-eos-utility-without-the-cd-or-old-version/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ForestGump</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon eos utility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forestgumpsays.com/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Missing the Canon EOS utility and can not find your CD. Canon does not provide the original version of EOS utility on their website. All the updates they do provide can only be installed on your system if you have the old version on CD or on your Hard drive. I have encountered this problem [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.forestgumpsays.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/canon.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-300" style="margin: 4px 8px;" title="canon" src="http://www.forestgumpsays.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/canon.gif" alt="" width="90" height="23" /></a>Missing the Canon EOS utility and can not find your CD. Canon does not provide the original version of EOS utility on their website. All the updates they do provide can only be installed on your system if you  have the old version on CD or on your Hard drive.</p>
<p>I have encountered this problem and I found a solution for mac.</p>
<p>First of all, get the update for EOS Utility from the official site. The important part is has to be the EOS Utility 2.4 Updater for Mac OS X (Mac OS 10.3 -10.5)</p>
<p>The newer version can not have this hack applied to it.</p>
<p>After you download it then drag the app to your desktop and then right click to &#8220;show its contents&#8221; Then navigate to [Contents &gt; Resources] and remove the file (update.plist)</p>
<p>Now you can  run this application as a normal installer and not just an upgrader.</p>
<!-- AdSense Now! V1.98 -->
<!-- Post[count: 2] -->
<div class="adsense adsense-leadout" style="float:left;margin: 12px;"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "ca-pub-6749835993191282";
/* Forest Post AD */
google_ad_slot = "4150482951";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/install-canon-eos-utility-without-the-cd-or-old-version/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe Photoshop Brushes Dissapear</title>
		<link>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/adobe-photoshop-brushes-dissapear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/adobe-photoshop-brushes-dissapear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ForestGump</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forestgumpsays.com/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you been using photoshop and the brushes tool just stops showing the size and only the cross-hairs?  You know you did not go into the preferences and change it to show cross hairs. You have restarted photoshop and its still not the right tool setting. Don&#8217;t panic,  Its a simple fix. You have the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you been using photoshop and the brushes tool just stops showing the size and only the cross-hairs?  You know you did not go into the preferences and change it to show cross hairs. You have restarted photoshop and its still not the right tool setting. Don&#8217;t panic,  Its a simple fix. You have the CAPS Locks button on. So no need to check the preferences nor to restart the computer. Just click it off and resume work.</p>
<p>If that did not solve your problem then here is another fix. If your brush is just not showing up completely then you can try this. Go into the control panel and under Display &gt;  select Settings &gt; then click on the Advanced button &gt; and then go  into the troubleshooting folder.Adjust your  slider under &#8220;Hardware  Acceleration&#8221; one or two notches to the left. Then your brushes display should work normally. Hopefully you will not notice much, if any decrease in  performance.</p>
<p>I hope one of these solutions works for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/adobe-photoshop-brushes-dissapear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D200 New for $600</title>
		<link>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/nikon-d200-new-for-600/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/nikon-d200-new-for-600/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ForestGump</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon d200]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forestgumpsays.com/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you watch closely Best Buy has been selling new Nikon D200&#8242;s for $599.00 plus tax and shipping. They list their sale on or about the 15th of the month for the last . They only run it for 48 hours. I caught the last one and bought it. The D200 is a great camera [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.forestgumpsays.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/nikon_d200b.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Nikon D200" align="left" hspace="1" vspace="1" />If you watch closely Best Buy has been selling new Nikon D200&#8242;s for $599.00 plus tax and shipping. They list their sale on or about the 15th of the month for the last . They only run it for 48 hours. I caught the last one and bought it. The D200 is a great camera for that price point. I had my eye on a D90 but it still $900 and does not have a sealed body. Plus they say the video capabilities are just about worthless. If you set you home page to <a href="http://dealmac.com/" target="_blank">DealMac.com</a> it will tell you when this deal comes back around plus of course lots of other great deals. I have also found many compact flash memory card deals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/nikon-d200-new-for-600/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Camera deals too good to be true</title>
		<link>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/camera-deals-too-good-to-be-true/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/camera-deals-too-good-to-be-true/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ForestGump</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buying new Digital SLR cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forestgumpsays.com/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you find a good camera deal online then know some of these pitfalls. The digital SLR camera deals that are too good to be true work like this. First of all they are going to sell you a Non-USA model of camera. This is not so bad but Nikon or Canon USA will not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you find a good camera deal online then know some of these pitfalls. The digital SLR camera deals that are too good to be true work like this. First of all they are going to sell you a Non-USA model of camera. This is not so bad but Nikon or Canon USA will not repair it under warranty. So if you choose this route then do get a third party warranty. I personally like <a href="http://www.squaretrade.com" target="_blank">SquareTrade </a>Ok but we are not done yet. These &#8220;gray market&#8221; dealers will only be selling you the body alone. They will pull out the battery, the charger, and even the camera strap. They then will try to sell you these back at a very high price. The good news is you can buy them off of ebay for much less. If you tell them this then they most likely will tell you the camera is not in stock and not complete the sale. Also be carefull of buying from a place that does not show you their address and phone number. I have heard of people getting burned from filling out an order form online and having their card charged and never recieve a camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/camera-deals-too-good-to-be-true/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CS3 Adobe Bridge running too slow?</title>
		<link>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/cs3-adobe-bridge-running-too-slow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/cs3-adobe-bridge-running-too-slow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 00:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ForestGump</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe Bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CS3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forestgumpsays.com/?p=68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was all excited about having the new version of adobe bridge running on my machine. I enjoyed the last version quite a bit. However it was running painfully slow. I tried changing the cache and some other setting to no avail. I have the latest update from adobe. So I did some research and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was all excited about having the new version of adobe bridge running on my machine. I enjoyed the last version quite a bit. However it was running painfully slow. I tried changing the cache and some other setting to no avail. I have the latest update from adobe. So I did some research and found a single reference to someone with my same problem. It turns out if you have two monitors Bridge requires that each one have 64meg of Vram available. Well I am still running a dual G5 with the ATI 9600 video card and it has 64meg total V-ram. They mentioned you could run in thousands of colors mode or go into the preference and turn on software acceleration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/cs3-adobe-bridge-running-too-slow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>360 Degree Panoramic Photos</title>
		<link>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/360-degree-panoramic-photos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/360-degree-panoramic-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 08:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ForestGump</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[360 Degree Panoramic Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panoramic Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panoramic Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panorma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forestgumpsays.com/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have had an amazingly fun time shooting and building these Panoramic Photos. I use my Nikon D200 with a Nikkor 10.5mm lens and shoot 10 HDR, high dynamic range, photos of a scene. I have shot both interior and exterior locations. I have a special nodal point tripod head that rotates the camera directly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.forestgumpsays.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/mcclay4pano240.jpg" alt="Panoramic Photos" hspace="4" align="left" /> I have had an amazingly fun time shooting and building these Panoramic Photos. I use my Nikon D200 with a Nikkor 10.5mm lens and shoot 10 HDR, high dynamic range, photos of a scene. I have shot both interior and exterior locations. I have a special nodal point tripod head that rotates the camera directly over the center of the tripod. I also take a shot directly up and one directly down. I then take these shots and blend them in a program called Brackateer that makes the HDR file from my three RAW files of each angle. I then take the HDR files into a program called <a title="panoramic software" href="http://www.ptgui.com">PTGui</a>.</p>
<p>PtGui will align and build the equirectangular image and form it into a <span id="more-67"></span>cylindrical image if you so desire. The software is very nice and I have yet to learn everything it is capable of. After building the panoramic image I then take the file into a program called Cubic Converter. It will take the cylindrical image and output 6 flat images that you can retouch in photoshop and then reassemble the cubed images back into a Quicktime 360 Panoramic movie file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/360-degree-panoramic-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getty Images Agrees to Multi Billion Dollar Buyout</title>
		<link>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/getty-images-agrees-to-multi-billion-dollar-buyout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/getty-images-agrees-to-multi-billion-dollar-buyout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ForestGump</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forge design photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Getty Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Istock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forestgumpsays.com/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been contemplating listing my photos with Getty&#8217;s sub royalty-free photo company, istock for some time now. Here is some recent news that caught my attention. Getty Images Inc. agreed to a $2.1 billion buyout from the private equity group Hellman &#38; Friedman LLC. The San Francisco-based Hellman &#38; Friedman offered $34 per share [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.forestgumpsays.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/logo-getty-black.gif" alt="Getty Logo" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" />I have been contemplating listing my photos with Getty&#8217;s sub royalty-free photo company, istock for some time now. Here is some recent news that caught my attention. Getty Images Inc. agreed to a $2.1 billion buyout from the private equity group Hellman &amp; Friedman LLC. The San Francisco-based Hellman &amp; Friedman offered $34 per share in cash for all of Getty&#8217;s shares, a 39 percent premium over <span id="more-37"></span>Friday&#8217;s market close. The company&#8217;s shares jumped $7.22, or 29.5 percent, to $31.67 on Monday. this is good news for a company who&#8217;s stock has been taking a beating over the last two years. The downward trend is due to many stock photo buyers, mostly print publications having constantly lowering budgets.  It  makes me wonder what the next two years holds considering the trends in  digital publishing. I definitely will keep my eye on this trend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/getty-images-agrees-to-multi-billion-dollar-buyout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opteka D80 Battery Grip</title>
		<link>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/opteka-d80-battery-grip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/opteka-d80-battery-grip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 14:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ForestGump</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon MB-D200 battery grip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opteka D80 Battery Grip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forestgumpsays.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was able to use this grip now for over 300 shots. I can say that it is not as nice as the Nikon MB-D200 battery grip. It is actually a bit large for my hands and it feels a bit cheap. However after reading some reviews. It seems that that is the same exact [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.forestgumpsays.com/?attachment_id=11" rel="attachment wp-att-11" title="Opteka D80 Battery Grip"><img src="http://www.forestgumpsays.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/otekagrip21.jpg" alt="Opteka D80 Battery Grip" align="left" border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" /></a>I was able to use this grip now for over 300 shots. I can say that it is not as nice as the Nikon MB-D200 battery grip. It is actually a bit large for my hands and it feels a bit cheap. However after reading some reviews. It seems that that is the same exact description for the Nikon MB-D80 battery grip. So for half the price I don&#8217;t feel so bad. One saving grace is that the AF button on it is nice and an option not on the MB-D200 unit. Plus I understand the reason for making it all plastic so as to save weight. Overall its a product I would recommend buying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/opteka-d80-battery-grip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon MB-D80 Alternative</title>
		<link>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/nikon-mb-d80-alternative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/nikon-mb-d80-alternative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ForestGump</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon mb-d80]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opteka battery grip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forestgumpsays.com/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was doing a search for a Battery Grip for the D80 and found that there is a third party maker for this item. Opteka makes one at half the price. S o I ordered one from 47thstreet photo. Actually it was $10 cheaper to buy it on Amazon.com . Which was reselling it for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.forestgumpsays.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/nikon_d80_grip-2.jpg" alt="MB-D80 Battery Grip" align="left" border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" />I was doing a search for a Battery Grip for the D80 and found that there is a third party maker for this item. Opteka makes one at half the price. S o I ordered one from 47thstreet photo. Actually it was  $10  cheaper to buy it on Amazon.com . Which was reselling it for 47thstreet photo.  I will post later how well I like it and if its as good as the MB-D200 unit from Nikon.<span id="customhtml"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forestgumpsays.com/nikon-mb-d80-alternative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

